Lab & Standards

Legal doesn't mean safe.

Most US drinking-water standards were set in the early 2000s — before modern epidemiology revealed the chronic, low-dose carcinogenic risk of many regulated chemicals. Independent public-health scientists now recommend safety thresholds up to 2,500× stricter than what the EPA currently enforces.

Frozen in 2001

The federal arsenic standard of 10 ppb was finalized in 2001 and has never been updated, despite two decades of cancer-incidence data calling for a sub-1 ppb limit.

Peer-reviewed thresholds

Health guidelines used here are sourced from the California OEHHA, the U.S. EPA Integrated Risk Information System, and meta-analyses published in peer-reviewed toxicology journals.

Transparent methodology

Every multiplier on the platform is computed as (utility detected level) ÷ (health guideline). We never hide the math — every row is auditable.

Comparative table

EPA Legal Limit vs. Independent Health Guideline

Arsenic
Effect: Bladder, lung & skin cancer
Unit: ppb
Health Guideline
0.004
EPA Legal Limit
10
Legal is
2,500×
above health guideline
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Effect: Cancer; fetal development harm
Unit: ppb
Health Guideline
0.15
EPA Legal Limit
80
Legal is
533×
above health guideline
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr-6)
Effect: Stomach & gastrointestinal cancer
Unit: ppb
Health Guideline
0.02
EPA Legal Limit
100
Legal is
5,000×
above health guideline
Nitrate
Effect: Cancer; blue-baby syndrome
Unit: ppm
Health Guideline
0.14
EPA Legal Limit
10
Legal is
71×
above health guideline
Radium 226 + 228
Effect: Cancer; bone toxicity
Unit: pCi/L
Health Guideline
0.05
EPA Legal Limit
5
Legal is
100×
above health guideline
PFOA (Forever chemical)
Effect: Immune, thyroid, kidney cancer
Unit: ppt
Health Guideline
0.0079
EPA Legal Limit
4
Legal is
506×
above health guideline

Editorial Note

The standards your family drinks under were written in a different century.

Updating a single federal drinking-water standard now requires an average of 17 years of regulatory review — far slower than the pace at which new contaminants enter the supply.

Until the legal framework catches up, household-level filtration remains the single most effective public-health intervention an individual family can take.